http://www.rinascita.eu/mktumb640a.php?image=1308764891.jpg

A virus called democracy, the evil of the twentieth century. A deadly bacterium put into circulation by the fall of the Soviet Union. The moralists will say that since the fall of the wall has come true the dream of freedom so much that you want, and then answer with a famous quote by Friedrich Nietzsche, "there is no other way to restore honor in politics, the first thing you have to hang the moralists" . Just after a decade since that fateful 1989 the number of democratic nations in the world had already grown from sixty to one hundred and eighteen, but at what price? 
At a time when the Berlin Wall collapsed, an ocean of illusions and false hopes through the Iron Curtain, until that day symbol of the division between the free world and totalitarianism. But the democratic virus does not stop there and also begins to expand in Southeast Asia, Latin America and even in China, bringing with them a peculiar symptom, ie slavery. Yes, you read right: slavery or total dependence on poverty. Because in that decade almost twenty-seven million people are reduced to the margins even in some Western European countries. The globalization and the advent of democracy, paradoxically, encourage the exploitation of slave labor on an industrial scale. Democracy and slavery are held together by what is called a direct correlation; the evolution of one affects the other. Another paradox is manifested from the fifties, but strongly accentuated after 1989, during the process of decolonization. In the moment in which the colonies obtained autonomy, the number of slaves increases while their price is lowered. 
Well I wonder, who has served this process? 
Risulterei trivial by answering "the usual families of global finance." Although the speech is all there. And it is wrong to think that the exploitation of slaves is the practice of the wealthiest nations at the expense of poorer ones, and therefore more vulnerable. 
The profiteers are the same countrymen. You may wonder, as we call this system? Sovereign Finance, and is a result of radical changes in societies, cultures and nations. The Sovereign Finance takes the place of a political class that proves to not be able to make choices and decided to set with regard to the state economy. If the state coffers have no guardians, the first vultures sling and plunder. It 's simple process, even if the story behind the complex theories and incomprehensible. And it is this logic that has destroyed empires, great cultures and great nations. And it's always the same logic that is destroying the collective consciousness, because it is present every day, in every act of every man. From communications, security; by the needs of human actions "humanitarian" (better: humanitarian bales). 
And today the Finance World is in turmoil, is agitated, restless. How so? We may be in the midst of another historic change? Maybe something is changing, in a radical way? The Italian political class (as well as all the European political classes, or nearly so) is the mirror of the international political scene. When the Soviet Union collapsed in Italy was dismantled a popular representation, almost entirely. 
An event that marked the end of the First Republic, as well as "Clean Hands", is also the adoption of the euro by Italy. Let's be clear: there are events that have come true in the same year, some at a distance of nearly a decade, but radical changes are fractures that develop into periods defined, indeed variables. They can last five years, as tens. But be it a coincidence these events? 
And 'the advent of a new change that worries because, if left unchecked, will always favor the Finance World that, in addition to the debt of the states, is the only thing that can be said still sovereign in a world that is disintegrating in the deep of their souls. Unfortunately (or fortunately, you will see) the change is - obviously - taking the form which the Financial World has, in the secrecy of its offices distributed throughout the globe, decided. A confirmation of this is the increase in interest on mortgages. According to data from the Bank of Italy, in August the average interest rate on loans is now up to 3.70%. As the year before, in the same month, the rate was one percentage point less than about (2.86%). This is the consequence of the attitude taken by Europe to save the banks, holding down the cost of borrowing. So now you do not think of mica take out a mortgage, it would be your downfall, as the official rate of the Central Bank is 1.5% and then you could also get to pay interest at 5%. Crazy stuff. 
According to a survey of the Observatory financial gain shares of the different banks have increased in the summer months (looks a bit '! Just the months in which they were put into the various assets from the government). Veneto Banca has increased the proportion of 2.4%, and a customer is forced to pay 4% more interest. Then comes Credem, with a spread jumped by 2%. 
At the third step of the podium are the Banca Popolare di Vicenza, with increases of up to 1.9%, reaching 3.9% spread for variable mortgages indexed to the ECB rate. Here are the big banks Intesa and Unicredit and, for the latter, making an average between the various types of mutual gain is the increase in the proportion of 1.7%. 
For Intesa instead the increase for all housing loans range from 0.4% to 0.75% compared to the summer months of this year. In the bottom of the "black list" of the Observatory are also Banca Sella, Cariparma, BPM, Carige, BNL and the Italian Post Office. 
Sure, they increase the indices and values ​​of interest to us instead increase debt and decrease the money, a strategy that smacks of scam now, but they did not: it is never that banks should not speculate about the poor bastards. The banks always survive, indeed, in times of profound change, increased and with them the real owners of the banks. It will be a case? 
Source:Rinascita,