martedì 26 agosto 2014

Nuclear and risk of accidents

Operationgreenrights: 

skeletons in the closet of Enel


alt
New action to Anonymous within the broader operation '#OperationGreenRights': the group of hacktivists has stolen and then made ​​public on the blog  anon-news a great deal of material on the Mochovce nuclear power plant in Slovakia, and the electric Torrevaldaliga north, both owned by Enel. 

From the emails and documents released by the network from Anonymoyus is learned that the construction of the two plants took place in the first case without complying with the most basic safety criteria and in accordance with shoddy materials, thus making the two plants harmful and very high risk of accidents. 

The claim of the hacker group's successful operation ends with a message of support to those who struggle daily against installations harmful and dangerous to the health of all and clearly reiterating the opposition to nuclear power and the criminal policies of exploitation Enel. 

The email that we are about to publish concerning the Mochovce nuclear power plant in Slovakia. The released material also contains documents relating to checks carried out on a wide variety of components. Premise that ENEL owns the plant through its subsidiary Slovenske Elektrarnestà completing the construction of two new reactors without, as the two existing minimum standards of security such as double containment walls of the fissile material. For the construction of two new reactors (3:04) will be used Soviet materials produced before the Chernobyl disaster (http://bit.ly/GJVBIF). Followed by detailed explanations of two different groups of documents in which the controls relating to the aforementioned reactors 3 and 4 carried out in a case by Ansaldo and another by STF controls on behalf of ENEL.

alt

alt


This e-mail of 21 March 2013 (https://privatepaste.com/01eaa1cada/kostf) comes from those governing STF controls. 

It's sent by a member of STF to other members of the same company. He says that "from a test carried out at the site of Mochovce is clear that the inspector who has followed the work of editing has not managed quality processes and documentation in an appropriate manner," but "at present the documentation has been brought into conformity despite the immensity of inconsistencies, "but" were not done the necessary checks. "This means that no one has really checked that the work of installation of reactors 3 and 4 are correct, in fact there is a '"immensity of inconsistencies" with respect to the project agreed. These "inconsistencies" are works poorly executed. However, the documentation issued to ENEL "has been brought into compliance," that all the problems have been silenced by manipulating the data. As underlined by the same sender (member STF) "the situation is even found piu'grave when you consider that these are mounted component in a nuclear power plant." 

Followed by another email, from Friday, January 18, 2013 is those relating to Ansaldo. (Https://privatepaste.com/9f9c945757/koansaldo)

alt

A member of Ansaldo writes, with regard to the test results, "not to get lost in the calculation notes" and pander to the comments ENEL. As can be seen from the last part of the email indicated, the mathematical models prepared by Ansaldo did not include irregularities in the functioning of the central component of the A202, but the model actually turned out to be wrong because they say "support free up" , then ENEL noted with critical comments that there is a "non-linearity" (ie unpredictability) in the operation of nuclear reactors (https://privatepaste.com/9f9c945757/koansaldo). Among the documents released there are others dating back to December 20, 2012, where we report the results of checks carried out on the plant Mochovce. As you can see even from a first glance, the problems highlighted are numerous and many are listed as "critical" (very severe). Similar conclusions can be drawn by looking at the details of the projects of various pipes and components, these are loads of red arrows that indicate critical.

alt





Torrevaldaliga Nord power plant

Emissions (Source: carma.org)

name             emissions_kg             year
Carbon Dioxide     4,355,010,000.00     2000
Carbon Dioxide     4,338,770,000.00     2007
Carbon Dioxide     19,504,500,000.00     2020

With this second action, Anonymous wants to make its contribution to those who day-to-day struggles in the place where he lives, against coal burning power plants that pollute the air. And 'thanks to the work of the Committee of documentation "Fearless," which fight against Torrevaldaliga north, which today we can say with certainty that the plant operates with technologies cited poor burning of coal each year an amount greater than one million tonnes at maximum, for health reasons, by the laws in force. In addition, it was found that the amount of coal contains sulfur ina three times higher than what is allowed, what causes acid rain were widespread. The mayor of Civitavecchia has complained about the fumes and dust released from the plant, a veritable fog; he also pointed out the enormous increase of devastating cancers of various kinds. This is consistent with the assessments made by the agency of the European environment in 2012 which shows that systems such as those Torrevaldaliga un'impatto have on public health even higher than that of 'ILVA Taranto. This filthy factory of death is not limited to killing by poisoning the air, but engulfs the lives of the workers who work there, in fact the last serious accident at the aforementioned building dates from March 2013, a silencer broke out, and in the fall earth, could have hit some workers with tragic consequences. The plant has been featured in numerous accidents in the past, due to the reduction of expenditure on safety and maintenance. The dead that Enel's Torrevaldaliga North has caused are well 3.



alt

220 MB split archive files | ENEL coal Power Plant of Torrevaldaliga Nord :

1 commento:

  1. Hey, there is a broken link in this article, under the anchor text - carma.org
    Here is the working link so you can replace it - https://www.selectra.co.uk/energy/guides/market/carbon-monitoring-for-action

    RispondiElimina